J. Appl. Poult. Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J APPL POULT RES 1992. 1:104-109
© 1992 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lacy, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Czarick, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lacy, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Czarick, M.

Field Reports

Tunnel-Ventilated Broiler Houses: Broiler Performance and Operating Costs

M. P. Lacy

Extension Poultry Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602; Phone: (404) 542-1325; FAX: (404) 542-8383

M. Czarick

Extension Engineering Department, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602

Correspondence: M. P. Lacy

Interest continues to build in tunnel ventilation as a method of enhancing broiler performance and reducing mortality during warm weather. The perception that operating costs associated with this system may be high has caused concern. The purpose of this study was to collect and compare broiler performance data and operating costs of conventional and tunnel-ventilated broiler houses on a commercial broiler farm. Daily high temperatures during the study averaged 93°F (36°C). Typically, house temperatures were reduced 2 to 4°F (1 to 2°C) in the conventional house and 7 to 12°F (4 to 7°C) in the tunnel-ventilated house. Body weights at 55 days averaged 5.35 lbs. (2.43 kg) in the tunnel-ventilated house and 5.13 lbs. (2.33 kg) in the conventional house. Feed conversion was 2.03 and 2.05 in the tunnel-ventilated and conventional houses, respectively. Livability was essentially the same in both houses. Electricity costs over the entire growout in the tunnel-ventilated houses were nearly double those of the conventional house; however, these costs were only 20 to 30% higher on hot days. Fogging system water usage in the tunnel-ventilated house was more than twice that of the conventional house. Overall, the value of the enhanced performance of the broilers in the tunnel-ventilated house slightly offset the additional operating costs.

Key Words: Tunnel ventilation • broilers • performance • operating costs






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Poultry Science Association.