J. Appl. Poult. Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J APPL POULT RES 2001. 10:255-261
© 2001 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Webster, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Webster, A. B.

Field Reports

Reduction in Manure Weight and Volume Using an In-House Layer Manure Composition System Under Field Conditions

S. A. Thompson and P. M. Ndegwa

Department of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602

W. C. Merka and A. B. Webster

Department of Poultry Science, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602

Correspondence: S. A. Thompson

Many of the problems that have currently beset the commercial egg layer industry have arisen because of methods of handling the manure output from large flocks. Alternative techniques for handling of animal manure within animal production facilities will need to be developed to satisfy current and future zoning and environmental criteria placed on these types of operations. This paper discusses tests conducted in a commercial, naturally ventilated, high-rise layer house that involved an in- house deep litter manure management system. Layers at commercial densities deposited their manure onto stacked litter materials located directly beneath the cages. Regular turning of the litter facilitated composting within the layer house, resulting in a reduction of manure volume and weight. In the full-scale house, the deep litter system produced a 39% reduction in manure weight and a 37% reduction in manure volume over that of deep stacked raw manure. The compost at the end of these tests had a dry basis nutrient density of approximately 2% N, 8.5% P2O5, and 5.5% K2O. The compost had a decreased moisture content, improved handling properties, and less odor than raw manure.

Key Words: Commercial layers • in-house composting • manure







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Poultry Science Association.