|
|
||||||||
Field Reports |


* Poultry Science Department, University of Georgia, Rural Development Center, PO Box 1209, Tifton, Georgia 31793
Poultry Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 36849-5416
Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia 31793
Correspondence: W. A. Dozier, III, E-mail: bdozier{at}uga.edu
Pet-food manufacturers have specified to renderers the need for poultry by-product meal (PBM) to be manufactured without lower quality by-product fractions, such as feathers and heads, leading to a higher protein product than conventional feed-grade PBM. One result is that nutritionists are faced with greater nutrient variation among PBM sources. Thirty-six PBM samples (26 = feed grade and 10 = pet-food grade) were collected from commercial feed mills during a 3-mo period to assess nutrient composition and its variation. Pet-food-grade PBM had higher protein, less ash, and lower calcium than feed-grade PBM. Amino acid analyses indicated the pet-food-grade PBM had higher lysine and methionine, and the amino acids in pet-food-grade PBM exhibited higher digestibility compared with those in the feed-grade samples. Nutrient variability was more pronounced in the feed-grade PBM.
Key Words: animal by-product feedstuff ingredient poultry by-product meal
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. R. Cramer, M. W. Greenwood, J. S. Moritz, R. S. Beyer, and C. M. Parsons Protein quality of various raw and rendered by-product meals commonly incorporated into companion animal diets J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3285 - 3293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |