J. Appl. Poult. Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J APPL POULT RES 2004. 13:48-54
© 2004 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Northcutt, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Northcutt, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. R.

Research Reports

A Survey of Water Use and Common Industry Practices in Commercial Broiler Processing Facilities

J. K. Northcutt and D. R. Jones

USDA-ARS, Russell Research Center, Athens, Georgia 30604-5677

Correspondence: J. K. Northcutt, E-mail: jnorthcutt{at}saa.ars.usda.gov

A survey of commercial broiler processing facilities across the US was conducted to determine overall water use. Seventy-two percent of the respondents reported using city water to process broilers, and 66% reported discharging to city sewers. Over 41% of the responses were from facilities located in the Southeast; however, there was no relationship between location (region of US) of facility and water use or location of facility and water recycling/reuse. Overall, the average water use prior to implementation of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) was 20.6 L/bird, while the current post-HACCP water usage was reported as 26.0 L/bird. Analysis of data also showed a significant relationship between the amount of water used to process each broiler and the size of the broiler being processed. In addition, over 38% of the respondents reported that they recycle water, and a significant relationship was observed between the amount of water recycled and the size of facility. Data from this survey may be used to assist companies interested in establishing water conservation programs or conducting water audits.

Key Words: broiler • processing • water • Hazard Analysis • Critical Control Point




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. K. Northcutt, J. A. Cason, K. D. Ingram, D. P. Smith, R. J. Buhr, and D. L. Fletcher
Recovery of Bacteria from Broiler Carcasses After Immersion Chilling in Different Volumes of Water, Part 2
Poult. Sci., March 1, 2008; 87(3): 573 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. Northcutt, D. Smith, K. D. Ingram, A. Hinton Jr., and M. Musgrove
Recovery of Bacteria from Broiler Carcasses after Spray Washing with Acidified Electrolyzed Water or Sodium Hypochlorite Solutions
Poult. Sci., October 1, 2007; 86(10): 2239 - 2244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
R. Huezo, D. P. Smith, J. K. Northcutt, and D. L. Fletcher
Effect of Immersion or Dry Air Chilling on Broiler Carcass Moisture Retention and Breast Fillet Functionality
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2007; 16(3): 438 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
J. K. Northcutt
Water Use and Reuse in Commercial Turkey Processing Facilities
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2007; 16(4): 652 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
J. K. Northcutt and M. E. Berrang
Influence of a Chicken Transport Cage-Washing System on Wastewater Characteristics and Bacteria Recovery from Cage Flooring
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2006; 15(3): 457 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Poultry Science Association.