HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sohail, S. S. Articles by Roland, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sohail, S. S. Articles by Roland, D. A., Sr.

Effect of Reducing Cage Density on Performance and Economics of Second-Cycle (Force Rested) Commercial Leghorns

Department of Poultry Science and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Alabama 36849

Correspondence: D. A. Roland, Sr., E-mail: droland{at}acesag.auburn.edu

In 2002 the United Egg Producers announced a new certification program that requires a significant increase in space per hen to produce eggs meeting animal welfare guidelines. Because there is little information concerning the influence of space per hen on hen performance of modern strains and increased cost associated with reduced hen numbers, this study was conducted to determine the effect of increasing space per hen on hen performance and economic returns. HyLine W36 hens (n = 1,120) were force rested at 68 wk of age and were kept in an environmentally controlled house at 3 or 4 per cage (64 or 48 in. ²/hen). After force resting, hens were fed a commercial layer corn-soy diet containing 0.92% lysine and 1,283 kcal ME/lb (2,823 kcal ME/kg) feed for 14 wk. Average house temperature was maintained at 78°F (25.6°C), and hens were provided a 16L:8D photoperiod. Increasing space per hen increased 14-wk average feed intake (85.7 to 89.6 g; P < 0.001), egg production (73 to 75%; P < 0.05), and egg weight (61.7 to 62.4g; P < 0.05) but had no effect on egg specific gravity or mortality. Increasing space per hen improved overall feed efficiency from 3.17 to 3.11 lb (1.44 to 1.41 kg) of feed per dozen eggs (P < 0.05) and improved egg mass from 45.0 to 47.0 g/h per day (P < 0.01). Economic analysis of increasing space per hen indicated an increase in return (egg price minus feed cost) with the increase dependent upon the price spread between large, extra-large, and jumbo eggs. The significant improvement in feed efficiency would help offset some of the cost involved in increasing space per hen (hen numbers) during summer months. Results could be different for larger strains and under different environmental conditions.

Key Words: cage density • egg mass • economics analysis • feed efficiency • force rested • hen

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Valkonen, E. Venalainen, L. Rossow, and J. Valaja Effects of Dietary Energy Content on the Performance of Laying Hens in Furnished and Conventional Cages Poult. Sci., May 1, 2008; 87(5): 844 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]