J. Appl. Poult. Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J APPL POULT RES 2005. 14:296-305
© 2005 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoehler, D.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hoehler, D.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, K.

Research Reports

Impact of Methionine Sources on Performance in Turkeys

D. Hoehler*, A. Lemme{dagger}, K. Roberson{ddagger} and K. Turner§

* Degussa Corporation, 1701 Barrett Lakes Blvd., Suite 340, Kennesaw, Georgia 30144-3694
{dagger} Degussa AG, Feed Additives, Rodenbacher Chaussee, 4 63457 Hanau, Germany
{ddagger} Michigan State University, Department of Animal Science, 2209 Anthony Hall, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1225
§ Akey Inc., Nutrition and Research Center, 250 West Clay Street, C. S. 5002, Lewisburg, Ohio 45338

Correspondence: D. Hoehler, E-mail: dirk.hoehler{at}degussa.com

Data are scarce for relative effectiveness of the liquid hydroxy analogue of Met (MHA-FA) relative to DL-Met (DLM) in turkeys. In the current paper, 2 experiments are presented in order to determine the relative effectiveness of liquid MHA-FA. In trial 1, female 1-d-old Hybrid Converter turkeys were fed 13 different corn-soy diets supplemented with graded levels of DLM, diluted DLM (65%), or liquid MHA-FA (0.07, 0.14, 0.21, 0.28%) from d 7 to 50. DLM (65%) treatments can be regarded as an internal standard for the validation of exponential regression analysis. In trial 2, male 1-d-old BUTA Big 6 turkeys were assigned to 63 battery cages for 21 d. Treatments consisted of a basal corn-soy diet and 2 series each containing graded levels of either DLM (0.100, 0.200, 0.300%) or liquid MHA-FA (0.154, 0.308, 0.462%). The ratio between both products at the 3 corresponding inclusion levels was 65% weight/weight. In both trials, basal diets were formulated to be deficient in Met + Cys but adequate in all other nutrients and energy. Exponential regression analysis revealed a relative effectiveness for weight gain and feed conversion of liquid MHA-FA of 68 and 56% vs. DLM in trial 1, respectively, and of 66 and 44% in trial 2, respectively. These findings support the hypothesis of a relative bioeffectiveness of approximately 65% of liquid MHA-FA as compared with DLM.

Key Words: turkey • amino acid • methionine source • bioefficacy • exponential regression




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
R. Gonzales-Esquerra, M. Vazquez-Anon, T. Hampton, T. York, S. Feine, C. Wuelling, and C. Knight
Evidence of a Different Dose Response in Turkeys When Fed 2-Hydroxy-4(Methylthio) Butanoic Acid Versus DL-Methionine
Poult. Sci., March 1, 2007; 86(3): 517 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Poultry Science Association.