J. Appl. Poult. Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J APPL POULT RES 2006. 15:531-537
© 2006 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macklin, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Macklin, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, R. A.

Research Reports

Effects of In-House Composting of Litter on Bacterial Levels

K. S. Macklin1, J. B. Hess, S. F. Bilgili and R. A. Norton

Department of Poultry Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849

1 Corresponding author: macklks{at}auburn.edu

Placing 1-d-old chicks on used litter may lead to unexpected health problems due to high bacteriological counts. Composting litter between flocks is one possible method of decreasing bacteriological counts. At the end of two 7-wk broiler growouts, in-house composting of pine shaving litter was performed, and bacterial counts were taken. In the first trial, composted pine shavings attained an internal temperature of 55°C that lasted for 40 h. After the initial temperature gain, the composted litter maintained a steady temperature of 35°C. Aerobic and anaerobic bacterial counts were lower in composted vs. uncomposted litter. Moisture content was lower in the uncomposted pile than the compost pile. Water activity was higher in the composted pile than in the uncomposted litter. Among the 8 treatments in the second trial, litter that was composted, wetted, and covered achieved the highest internal temperatures of >50°C, which was sustained until trial termination (7 d). The other treatments did not achieve a temperature increase of this magnitude and, if not wetted, the observed temperature increase lasted <24 h. In litter that had been composted for 1 wk, moisture content was lower regardless of treatment. Water activity was highest in treatments that had water added and that were not covered. Composted, covered, not wetted pine shavings produced the lowest aerobic and anaerobic bacterial counts. The results of these 2 trials show that in-house composting of pine shaving litter can reduce bacterial counts, especially when the compost pile is covered.

Key Words: bacterial count • compost • in-house




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
J. J. Giambrone, O. Fagbohun, and K. S. Macklin
Management Practices to Reduce Infectious Laryngotracheitis Virus in Poultry Litter
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 64 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
K. S. Macklin, J. B. Hess, and S. F. Bilgili
In-House Windrow Composting and Its Effects on Foodborne Pathogens
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 121 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Poultry Science Association.