HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wall, H. Articles by Tauson, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wall, H. Articles by Tauson, R.

Perch Arrangements in Small-Group Furnished Cages for Laying Hens

Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden

¹ Corresponding author: Helena.Wall{at}huv.slu.se

In 2 trials, including 2,768 birds in total, 3 different perch arrangements were evaluated in furnished 8-hen cages for laying hens. The hybrids used were Lohmann Selected Leghorn and Lohmann Brown in trial 1 and Hy-Line White and Hy-Line Brown in trial 2. The furnished cages were identical in all other respects than the arrangement of perches. A perch was either fitted across the cage, providing 12 cm of perch per hen, or 2 perches were installed in a cross, implying 15 cm per hen. Although the perches arranged in a cross provided more perch per hen than the single perch fitted across the cage, perch use at night by the birds was similar or lower as compared with the single perch. Hence, the way perches are arranged in the cage may be as important as perch length itself to achieve a high use at night. Perch arrangement did not affect production, mortality, or egg quality. Compared with a conventional battery cage, also included in the trials, hygiene was inferior in the furnished cages, but there was no difference in proportions of dirty eggs. Differences in proportions of cracked eggs were found between furnished and conventional cages in 1 of the trials. However, on the whole, production, mortality, and egg quality were at similar levels in all cage models. Genotype differences were found in production traits, egg quality, hygiene, and in the use of perches and nests.

Key Words: furnished cage • conventional cage • egg quality and production • perch • hygiene • nest • genotype

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Wall, R. Tauson, and K. Elwinger Effects of Litter Substrate and Genotype on Layers' Use of Litter, Exterior Appearance, and Heterophil:Lymphocyte Ratios in Furnished Cages Poult. Sci., December 1, 2008; 87(12): 2458 - 2465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Wall, R. Tauson, and S. Sorgjerd Bacterial Contamination of Eggshells in Furnished and Conventional Cages J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 11 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]