J. Appl. Poult. Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J APPL POULT RES 2008. 17:101-108. doi:10.3382/japr.2007-00048
© 2008 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siudzinska, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lukaszewicz, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Siudzinska, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lukaszewicz, E.

Research Reports

Effect of Semen Extenders and Storage Time on Sperm Morphology of Four Chicken Breeds

A. Siudzinska and E. Lukaszewicz1

Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Department of Poultry Breeding, Chelmonskiego 38c, 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland

Correspondence: 1 Corresponding author: ewa{at}gen.ar.wroc.pl

A wide range of extenders are available for storing fowl semen. Three of them (the Lake extender, the EK extender described by lukaszewicz, and an extender described by Tselutin et al.) were tested for their suitability to store semen of 4 fowl breeds: Green-Legged Partridge, Black Minorca, White Crested Black Polish, and Italian Partridge. Changes in spermatozoa viability and morphology were evaluated in fresh neat semen and in semen diluted 1:4 and stored for 3, 6, and 24 h at 4°C. During the time of semen storage, a decrease in the number of live, morphologically normal spermatozoa and an increase in dead spermatozoa and spermatozoa with bent necks were observed. The EK extender was found to be the most suitable regardless of the fowl breed because the number of live spermatozoa did not decrease as much as in semen diluted with the other extenders. The Lake extender had the least beneficial effect on stored sperm morphology in every breed.

Key Words: sperm quality • in vitro storage • semen extender • sperm morphology







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Poultry Science Association.