HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fancher, B. I. Articles by Trimbee, B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Fancher, B. I. Articles by Trimbee, B.

Feed Processing Using the Annular Gap Expander and Its Impact on Poultry Performance

Omnus, Inc., #20 Research Park Drive, St. Charles, MO 63304; Phone: (314) 926-7401; FAX: (314) 926-7405

Dan Rollins

ConAgra Poultry Co., 2475 Meadowbrook Parkway, P. O. Box 1389, Duluth, GA 30136

Bob Trimbee

Sprout Matador, 1322 Union Hill Road, Alpharetta, GA 30201

Correspondence: Bryan I. Fancher

The annular gap expander is a high temperature, short time conditioner primarily used for pre-treatment of feed prior to pelleting [1, 2]. The device resembles a single-screw extruder, but differs by discharging material over an annular gap outlet design instead of forcing it through a fixed die. The expander is capable of greater throughput with lower energy costs. Expanders were used first in Northern Europe in the late 1980s to improve pellet quality while using high levels of liquids and by-product ingredients without compromising throughput requirements. Laws passed in Northern Europe requiring feed meet rigid thermal processing standards for biosecurity reasons, accelerated acceptance of the technology. North America first embraced the technology in 1993.

Evidence indicates expanded feed offers several benefits. While not a complete list, documented benefits include animal performance improvements, lower feed moisture, greater formulation flexibility, improved feed hygiene, increased mill throughput, manipulation of feed bulk density and particle size, ability to crumble without pelleting, and longer pellet die life. While representing an alternative to traditional conditioning technologies, expanders must be operated correctly for optimal results. Pellet mill energy costs are lower when using expanders; however, total manufacturing energy costs increase. Users must determine, under their own conditions, the cost:benefit relationship.

Key Words: Annular gap expanders • conditioning technology • feed efficiency • feed manufacturing • feed processors • pelleting

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Gonzalez-Alvarado, E. Jimenez-Moreno, R. Lazaro, and G. G. Mateos Effect of Type of Cereal, Heat Processing of the Cereal, and Inclusion of Fiber in the Diet on Productive Performance and Digestive Traits of Broilers Poult. Sci., August 1, 2007; 86(8): 1705 - 1715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Campbell, L. E. Russell, J. D. Crenshaw, K. C. Behnke, and P. M. Clark Growth response of broilers to spray-dried plasma in pelleted or expanded feed processed at high temperature J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2501 - 2508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]