J. Appl. Poult. Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J APPL POULT RES 1997. 6:319-324
© 1997 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kersey, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Waldroup, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kersey, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Waldroup, P. W.

Research Reports

Nutrient Composition of Spent Hen Meals Produced by Rendering

J. H. Kersey

Poultry Science Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701

C. M. Parsons

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801

N. M. Dale

Department of Poultry Science, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602

J. E. Marr

Cal-Maine Foods, Jackson, MS 39207

P. W. Waldroup

Poultry Science Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701; Phone: (501) 575-2065; FAX: (501) 575-3474

Correspondence: P. W. Waldroup

To obtain information on the nutrient content and variability of spent hen meal, we examined meal produced form end-of-lay hens by three Renderers using conventional rendering procedures. Meal from three Renderers varied considerably in nutrient content. Amino acid content as percentage of sample varied among Renderers, but when expressed as percentage of protein less variability was observed, especially for amino acids of practical concern. Although amino acid digestibility varied somewhat among sources, overall agreement was good; values in the present study should provide guidelines for estimating digestible amino acid content of spent hen meals produced by conventional rendering. Mean amino acid digestibility among sources was not directly associated with digestibility in 0.2 or 0.002% pepsin. Nutrient content of samples produced by a commercial renderer over a 27-wk period appeared reasonably consistent

Key Words: Disposal • nutrient composition • nutrient content • spent hen meal




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. O. Myer, J. H. Brendemuhl, F. W. Leak, and J. B. Hess
Evaluation of a rendered poultry mortality-soybean meal product as a supplemental protein source for pig diets
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2004; 82(4): 1071 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
W. K. Kim and P. H. Patterson
In Situ Evaluation of Hen Mortality Meal as a Protein Supplement for Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2003; 86(10): 3337 - 3342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Poultry Science Association.