HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Abrahamsson, P. Articles by Tauson, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Abrahamsson, P. Articles by Tauson, R.

Performance and Egg Quality of Laying Hens in an Aviary System

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-755 97 Uppsala, Sweden; Phone: + 46- (0) 18-674500; FAX: + 46- (0) 18-674501

Per Abrahamsson, E-mail:Per.Abrahamsson{at}huv.slu.se

Laying hens were kept in an aviary system on a practical scale under Swedish conditions during five entire production cycles. All hens were non beak-trimmed, since this is prohibited in Sweden. The aviary type used, Marielund, is a three-tiered aviary with litter. About 4700 hens kept in four pens were housed in each batch. Lohmann Selected Leghorn (LSL) layers were used in all five trials. In addition to LSL, the Lohmann Brown (LB) was used in Trial 3 and an experimental cross (SLU-1329) was used in Trial 5. The performance of the hens from 20 until 80 wk (18.6 to 22.5 kg/hen housed, as well as mortality (4.0 to 20.9%), varied between years. This variation was greater than could be expected in cage systems and was possibly the result of unpredictable cases of cannibalism, in the medium heavy brown hybrid especially, and/or parasitic disorders like Red mites or coccidiosis. The proportion of misplaced eggs (floor eggs) seemed to be influenced by rearing, but was also observed to vary between different pens within batch. The total range during the five trials was between 0.7 and 18.4%. The proportion of dirty eggs was highly dependent on the proportion of misplaced eggs.

Key Words: Aviary • egg production • egg quality • housing systems • laying hens

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Pauly, M. Dorner, X. Zhang, A. Hlinak, B. Dorner, and R. Schade Monitoring of laying capacity, immunoglobulin Y concentration, and antibody titer development in chickens immunized with ricin and botulinum toxins over a two-year period Poult. Sci., February 1, 2009; 88(2): 281 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Wall and R. Tauson Perch Arrangements in Small-Group Furnished Cages for Laying Hens J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2007; 16(3): 322 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Mertens, F. Bamelis, B. Kemps, B. Kamers, E. Verhoelst, B. De Ketelaere, M. Bain, E. Decuypere, and J. De Baerdemaeker Monitoring of eggshell breakage and eggshell strength in different production chains of consumption eggs. Poult. Sci., September 1, 2006; 85(9): 1670 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]