J. Appl. Poult. Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J APPL POULT RES 1998. 7:273-280
© 1998 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Russell, S. M.

Research Reports

Chemical Sanitizing Agents and Spoilage Bacteria on Fresh Broiler Carcasses

S. M. Russell

Department of Poultry Science, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2772; Phone: (706) 542-1368; FAX: (706) 542-1827

S. M. Russell

The effect of sanitizers on spoilage bacteria associated with poultry is not well known, and this study investigated this phenomenon. Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fragi, and Shewanella putrefaciens were collected from spoiled broiler carcasses. The following sanitizers in three replicate trials (Rep) were applied to the isolates: sodium hypochlorite (SH), quaternary ammonium (Quat), lactic acid (LA), trisodium phosphate (TSP), hydrogen peroxide (HP), and Timsen (TN), a novel compound containing a Quat derivative in combination with urea. SH eliminated growth of P. fluorescens, P. putida, and P. fragi, but did not consistently kill Shewanella putrefaciens at concentrations ≤50 ppm. Quat did not consistently eliminate any of the spoilage bacteria analyzed. At levels of 5% or above, LA eliminated or inhibited all spoilage isolates. At 0.5%, TSP eliminated pseudomonads, whereas a level of 1% or higher was required to prevent S. putrefaciens growth. HP was an effective sanitizer at 0.1%. Few spoilage bacteria multiplied in the presence of 10 ppm TN. S. putrefaciens grew when exposed to 10 ppm or 100 ppm TN in Reps 1 and 2, respectively. All of the sanitizers tested, except Quat, prevented growth of the pseudomonads. In general, S. putrefaciens was more resistant to sanitizers than were the pseudomonads.

Key Words: Inhibition • poultry • sanitizers • spoilage bacteria







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Poultry Science Association.