J. Appl. Poult. Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J APPL POULT RES 1999. 8:62-66
© 1999 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harms, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harms, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, G. B.

Research Reports

A Comparison of the Energy Used by Four Strains of Commercial Laying Hens to Produce One Gram of Egg Content

R. H. Harms and G. B. Russell

Department of Dairy and Poultry Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; Phone: (352)392-1932; FAX: (352) 392-3047

Correspondence: R. H. Harms

Feed for commercial layers has been formulated based on feed intake and daily nutrient requirements. There is some question of whether feed formulated on percent of a nutrient in the diet is adequate for all strains or breeds. Energy required to produce 1g of egg content was determined for four strains of commercial layers (Hy-Line W-36, Hy-LineW-77, DeKalb Delta, and Bovan). The Hy-Line W-36 consumed significantly less energy per 1g of egg content than the other three strains. This finding indicates that the percentage of amino acids in the feed of the Hy-Line W-36 must be higher than for the other three strains.

Key Words: Energy intake • energy per g egg content • strains of laying hen







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Poultry Science Association.