J. Appl. Poult. Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J APPL POULT RES 1999. 8:362-367
© 1999 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giambrone, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Takeshita, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Giambrone, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Takeshita, K.

Research Reports

Monitoring the Immune Status of Broiler Breeders Against Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Using Progeny Challenge and Serologic Data

J. J. Giambrone and T. Dormitorio

Department of Poultry Science, Auburn University, AL 36849-5416; Phone: (334) 844-2642; FAX: (334) 844-2641

T. Brown

Department of Avian Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30601

K. Takeshita

IGI Vineland, Vineland, NJ 08360

J. J. Giambrone

Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)-induced immunosuppression causes sub-optimum performance in broilers. Integrators use enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as an indication of breeder vaccine success. The IBDV challenge of progeny correlates more closely to performance than does ELISA. Four IBDV serologic and challenge studies were undertaken using progeny from integrators to determine the efficacy of vaccination programs. All breeders received two live and two inactivated vaccines. For each experiment, day-old progeny were taken from six breeder flocks. At 2 wk, 15 progeny per flock were challenged with the serologic standard (STD) virus, 15 per flock with variant E, and 15 per flock with one of four variants (GA, ARK-1, ARK-2, and MISS). Percent protection for the STD were close to the MISS and ARK-1 isolates, whereas percent protection for the ARK-2 and GA isolates was similar to variant E. The new ELISA was improved over previous products and correlated with resistance to challenge against the STD, MISS, and ARK-1, but not with the other isolates. Therefore, producers must improve their vaccination programs or risk continued problems due to antigenic variants.

Key Words: Challenge • IBDV • immune suppression • monitoring • progeny




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
J. J. Giambrone, T. Dormitorio, K. Cookson, and K. Burns
Monitoring the Immune Status of Broilers Against Reoviruses Using Challenge and Serologic Data
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2007; 16(2): 187 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Poultry Science Association.