J. Appl. Poult. Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J APPL POULT RES 2005. 14:345-348
© 2005 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hargis, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hargis, B. M.

Field Reports

Evaluation of Intervention Strategies for Idiopathic Diarrhea in Commercial Turkey Brooding Houses

S. E. Higgins, A. Torres-Rodriguez, J. L. Vicente, C. D. Sartor, C. M. Pixley, G. M. Nava, G. Tellez, J. T. Barton and B. M. Hargis

University of Arkansas, Department of Poultry Science, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701

Correspondence: B. M. Hargis, E-mail: bhargis{at}uark.edu

In 3 separate commercial turkey brooder houses, we compared the effects of selected probiotic bacteria or antibiotics on performance of poults within a complex that was routinely experiencing mild idiopathic diarrhea and stunting. In all experiments, treatments of probiotic cultures or antibiotics were administered in the water. Poults were tagged and placed into individual pens (20 per pen, 4 replicate pens per treatment) within the brooding house, and performance was evaluated by body weight or body weight gain. In the first experiment, poults receiving 1 of 2 probiotic cultures weighed significantly more than nontreated or antibiotic-treated poults. In the second experiment, there were no significant differences among any of the groups. A third experiment was performed during a clinically significant Salmonella seftenburg infection. In this experiment, poults receiving antibiotics followed by a probiotic culture had significantly higher weight gain than nontreated or probiotic-treated poults.

Key Words: antibiotic • probiotic • poult • turkey • brooding • performance




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
S. E. Higgins, J. P. Higgins, A. D. Wolfenden, S. N. Henderson, A. Torres-Rodriguez, G. Tellez, and B. Hargis
Evaluation of a Lactobacillus-Based Probiotic Culture for the Reduction of Salmonella Enteritidis in Neonatal Broiler Chicks
Poult. Sci., January 1, 2008; 87(1): 27 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
S. E. Higgins, G. F. Erf, J. P. Higgins, S. N. Henderson, A. D. Wolfenden, G. Gaona-Ramirez, and B. M. Hargis
Effect of Probiotic Treatment in Broiler Chicks on Intestinal Macrophage Numbers and Phagocytosis of Salmonella Enteritidis by Abdominal Exudate Cells
Poult. Sci., November 1, 2007; 86(11): 2315 - 2321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. P. Higgins, S. E. Higgins, J. L. Vicente, A. D. Wolfenden, G. Tellez, and B. M. Hargis
Temporal Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria Probiotic Culture on Salmonella in Neonatal Broilers
Poult. Sci., August 1, 2007; 86(8): 1662 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
J. Vicente, A. Wolfenden, A. Torres-Rodriguez, S. Higgins, G. Tellez, and B. Hargis
Effect of a Lactobacillus Species-Based Probiotic and Dietary Lactose Prebiotic on Turkey Poult Performance With or Without Salmonella Enteritidis Challenge
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2007; 16(3): 361 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
A. Torres-Rodriguez, S. E. Higgins, J. L. S. Vicente, A. D. Wolfenden, G. Gaona-Ramirez, J. T. Barton, G. Tellez, A. M. Donoghue, and B. M. Hargis
Effect of Lactose as a Prebiotic on Turkey Body Weight Under Commercial Conditions
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2007; 16(4): 635 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Poultry Science Association.