HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moritz, J. S. Articles by Bryan, W. B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Moritz, J. S. Articles by Bryan, W. B.

Synthetic Methionine and Feed Restriction Effects on Performance and Meat Quality of Organically Reared Broiler Chickens

J. S. Moritz^*, A. S. Parsons^*, N. P. Buchanan^*, N. J. Baker^*, J. Jaczynski^*, O. J. Gekara and W. B. Bryan

^* Division of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506
Division of Plant and Soil Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506

Correspondence: J. S. Moritz, E-mail: jsmoritz{at}wvu.edu

Nutritionists have been challenged to find alternatives to synthetic methionine use in organic broiler diet formulation. Data do not exist on the ability of commercial broilers to partially meet amino acid requirements by foraging. In the current study, diets were formulated to include or preclude synthetic methionine (analyzed dietary methionine = 0.40 and 0.36%, respectively). Foraging ability was assessed by implementing 2 feeding strategies (ad libitum and restrictive feed access). The objectives of the study were 1) to determine performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality effects of organically reared broilers fed diets with and without synthetic methionine and 2) to assess these variables when feeding strategies were modified to encourage foraging. Experimentation focused on broilers in the 3-to-8-wk growing phase and was conducted during 2 different times of the year (summer and fall). During the 0-to-3-wk starter phase, all diets contained synthetic methionine. The time of year and associated environmental conditions were observed to have an effect on feed intake and subsequent performance and carcass quality. Broilers reared in summer and fed diets without synthetic methionine demonstrated trends toward decreased gain to feed ratio and breast yield compared with broilers fed diets that included synthetic methionine. These trends did not exist for broilers reared in fall that had comparably increased feed intake. However, suggested growth impairments and compensatory feed intake associated with a marginal methionine deficiency were largely overcome by bird foraging. Feed restriction was shown to be an effective strategy to increase commercial broiler forage intake.

Key Words: organic production • broiler production • methionine • feed restriction • meat quality

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. C. Fanatico, P. B. Pillai, J. L. Emmert, and C. M. Owens Meat Quality of Slow- and Fast-Growing Chicken Genotypes Fed Low-Nutrient or Standard Diets and Raised Indoors or with Outdoor Access Poult. Sci., October 1, 2007; 86(10): 2245 - 2255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. P. Buchanan, L. B. Kimbler, A. S. Parsons, G. E. Seidel, W. B. Bryan, E. E. D. Felton, and J. S. Moritz The Effects of Nonstarch Polysaccharide Enzyme Addition and Dietary Energy Restriction on Performance and Carcass Quality of Organic Broiler Chickens J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 1 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. P. Buchanan, J. M. Hott, L. B. Kimbler, and J. S. Moritz Nutrient Composition and Digestibility of Organic Broiler Diets and Pasture Forages J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 13 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]