HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Martin, S. A. Articles by Waltman, W. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Martin, S. A. Articles by Waltman, W. D., II

Microbiological Survey of Georgia Poultry Litter

Department of Animal and Dairy Science, 308 Livestock-Poultry Bldg., The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2771; Phone: (706) 542-1065; FAX: (706) 542-0399

W. Douglas Waltman, II

Georgia Poultry Laboratory, Oakwood, GA 30566

Correspondence: Scott A. Martin

Concern has been raised by Georgia beef producers regarding the safety of feeding large quantities of poultry litter to beef cattle. It is well known that poultry raised in confinement, especially chicks, is susceptible to infection by pathogenic microorganisms (i. e., Salmonella typhimurium). The objective of this study was to collect samples of poultry litter from different sources in Georgia and analyze each sample for the presence of pathogenic bacteria using selective microbiological media. While bacteria were isolated from every litter sample, no E. coli O157/H7 or Salmonella was detected in any sample. Mold contamination in most of the samples was extremely low. In addition to the microbiological analysis, the nutrient content of each litter sample was determined. All samples contained similar amounts (2 to 3%) of phosphorus, potassium, and calcium, while manganese concentrations were much lower. Sodium, aluminum, and iron concentrations were much higher than concentrations of zinc and copper; and ash averaged 30.4%. Crude protein in all samples was over 6-fold higher than bound protein, and the average moisture content was 21.9%. Collectively, these results suggest that poultry litter is not a source of harmful pathogenic bacteria when fed to beef cattle and is a good source of protein and some minerals.

Key Words: Escherichia coli • pathogens • poultry litter • Salmonella

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Rothrock Jr., K. L. Cook, J. G. Warren, and K. Sistani The Effect of Alum Addition on Microbial Communities in Poultry Litter Poult. Sci., August 1, 2008; 87(8): 1493 - 1503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Rothrock Jr, K. L. Cook, N. Lovanh, J. G. Warren, and K. Sistani Development of a Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay to Target a Novel Group of Ammonia-Producing Bacteria Found in Poultry Litter Poult. Sci., June 1, 2008; 87(6): 1058 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Lovanh, K. L. Cook, M. J. Rothrock, D. M. Miles, and K. Sistani Spatial Shifts in Microbial Population Structure Within Poultry Litter Associated with Physicochemical Properties Poult. Sci., September 1, 2007; 86(9): 1840 - 1849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Smith, D. J. V. Drum, Y. Dai, J. M. Kim, S. Sanchez, J. J. Maurer, C. L. Hofacre, and M. D. Lee Impact of Antimicrobial Usage on Antimicrobial Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Strains Colonizing Broiler Chickens Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 1, 2007; 73(5): 1404 - 1414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Enticknap, H. Nonogaki, A. R. Place, and R. T. Hill Microbial diversity associated with odor modification for production of fertilizers from chicken litter. Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2006; 72(6): 4105 - 4114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lu, S. Sanchez, C. Hofacre, J. J. Maurer, B. G. Harmon, and M. D. Lee Evaluation of Broiler Litter with Reference to the Microbial Composition as Assessed by Using 16S rRNA and Functional Gene Markers Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2003; 69(2): 901 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]